HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9675 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. October 31, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar, Jitendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal, Jaiyesh Bhoosreddy (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ishwar Dayal Tyagi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Industies And Cane Developmentandors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench