Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17938 (AP)

Neelam Muni Lakshmi, v. Neelam Srinivasulu,

CRP/1185/2024 · 2025-06-26

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010248482024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1185 OF 2024 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Civil Revision Petition against the Orders dated 06-05-2024 in I.A No.224 of 2024 in O.S. No.311 of 2021 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudur, Nellore District. Between: Neelam Muni Lakshmi, W/o Srinivasulu, Aged about 55 years, R/o Kapu Street, Nellore City, Nellore District. ...Petitioner AND Neelam Srinivasulu, S/o Venkata Krishnaiah, Aged about 57 years, Occ Attendar in R and B Office, Gudur, O/o the D.E., R and B Office, Opposite BSNL Office, Gudur Town, Gudur Mandal, Nellore District. ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Executive Engineer, R & B Department, Guduru Division, SPSR Nellore to withhold the eligible retirement benefits of respondent herein attachment before Judgment, pending disposal of above Revision Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI THOKA DEVA DEEPAK ANIRUDH YADAV as The Court made the following order: APHC010248482024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY.THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1185/2024 Between: Neelam Muni Lakshmi, ...PETITIONER AND Neelam Srinivasulu ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent: 1.THOKA DEVA DEEPAK ANIRUDH YADAV The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1. The Principal Civil Judge, Gudur,(Junior Division) Nellore District. 2. One CC to Sri. Harinath Reddy Soma, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. Thoka Deva Deepak Anirudh Yadav, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies To, MKP sree HIGH COURT DATED:27/06/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 1185 OF 2024 5 H .'UL 2025 m ^ . CuttenI SecBon •a DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS