Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179378 (ALL)

MUKUND SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/11022/2025 · 2025-11-27

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11022 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Purnendu Chakravarty, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Praveen Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and lerned AGA for the State. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioner and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 4. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 27, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Yadav, Atul Krishna, Prajjwal Harsh, Rishabh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Mukund Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Home Dept. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench