HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1876 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State. In view of order proposed to be passed, notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0258 of 2025 under Sections 3(5), 333, 109, 352, 351(2) BNS, Police Station-Badosari, District-Barabanki. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicants is that cross FIRs have been registered by both sides. Four persons have sustained injuries from applicants' side. The applicants' FIR was lodged first and as a counter blast, the instant FIR has been lodged making applicants accused in this case. It is a case of false implication. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the anticipatory bail application. He submits that both the applicants have criminal history of a similar nature, which was suppressed while filing the bail application. He also submits that five persons namely Anoop, Suraj, Rajkumar, Geeta and Rajesh have sustained injuries. Injured Rajkumar sustained injuries in the parietal bone. The injury sustained by Rajkumar is grievous in nature. Other injured namely Geeta Devi was also subjected to C.T. Scan. It is not a case of false implication. Perused the record. On due consideration of facts of case including that regarding an incident Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish (Maneesh Kumar) And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) cross FIRs have been registered by both sides, the fact that both the sides have sustained injuries, incident is admitted, and that injury sustained by injured-Rajkumar was grievous in nature, it cannot be said to be a case of false implication and as such, I am of the view that no case for anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. December 3, 2025 Vinay/- NABAIL No. 1876 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench