MOHAMMAD AHMAD v. SRI. SHRIDHAR PATHAK, S.H.O., PS. KARNILGANJ GONDA
/1255/2025 · 2025-11-19
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179324 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179324 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1255 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Case has been called in the revised list.
2. Neither learned counsel for the applicant is present to press the contempt application nor there is any request for adjournment or pass over of the case.
3. The contempt application is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. The notice, if any, issued against the respondent stands discharged. November 19, 2025 S. Kumar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd.Anas Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Mohammad Ahmad .....Applicant(s) Sri. Shridhar Pathak, S.H.O., Ps. Karnilganj Gonda .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench