Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179308 (ALL)

TANVEER ALAM AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/2177/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2177 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. A joint Vakalatnama filed by Sri Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate and Sri Ashish Kumar Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of opposite party No.2 is taken on record. 3. The present application has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 20357 of 2025 (State versus Tanveer Alam and others) arising out of case crime no.13 of 2025, under Sections 85 / 115(2) / 351(3) BNS, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District Amethi, pending before the Civil Judge (J.D.) D.V. Act, Sultanpur as well as impugned charge sheet dated 19.08.2025 and cognizance order dated 29.10.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that now parties have entered into compromise, therefore, this Court may please to quash the proceeding for which learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has no objection. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it within two weeks, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise with Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Tanveer Alam And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) two weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, the proceedings of the aforesaid case shall remain stayed. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 16, 2025 I.A. Siddiqui NA528 No. 2177 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMRAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench