SRI. PREM KUMAR KAIRI v. UNION OF INDIA AND 8 OTHERS
WP(C)/50/2025 · 2025-02-06
Arindam Lodh
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1793 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1793 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
IA No.1 of 2025 In WP(C) No.50 of 2025(D/O)
Union of India and 8 Ors.
….Applicant(s)
Versus
Sri Prem Kumar Kairi
….Respondent(s)
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. B. Majumder, Dy. SGI
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. Debalina Chakraborty, Advocate
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH
Order
21/03/2025
Heard Mr. B. Majumder, learned Dy. SGI appearing for the applicants. Also heard Ms. Debalina Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. This is an application filed by the applicants under Chapter VIII of the Tripura High Court Rules, 2023 for extension of time for conveying the final decision/implementation of the order dated 06.02.2025 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.50 of 2025. Mr. Majumder, learned Dy. SGI appearing for the applicants has submitted that due to administrative exigencies, the order of this Court has not been complied with, though it is in process. For the reason stated above, learned Dy. SGI has sought for 3(three) months’ time to take final decision in the matter of implementation of the
order dated 06.02.2025 passed by this Court. Ms. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, however, has submitted that 3(three) months’ time is too long and it should be 2(two) months. Considering the submission of Ms. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent, 2(two) months time is allowed to the applicants to take final
decision and for implementation of the order dated 06.02.2025 passed by this Court. Accordingly, the instant interlocutory application stands allowed and
disposed.
JUDGE
Snigdha SAIKA T KAR Digitally signed by SAIKAT KAR Date: 2025.03.24 14:21:54 +05'30'