Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- CM(M) No. 26/2025 CM Nos. 316 & 317/2025 CAV No. 86/2025
Suchittar Kumar Sharma …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Supreet Singh Johal, Advocate
Vs
Nirmal Sharma .…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (30.01.2025)
01. After arguing for a while, Mr. Supreet Singh Johal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner when confronted with the maintainability of the petition seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with a liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law.
02. At this stage, Mr. Johal, submits that the case is pending before the learned 1st Additional Munsiff (Forest Magistrate), Jammu since four years and no effective proceedings have taken place and accordingly he has requested this Court for expeditious trial so that the rights of both the parties are adjudicated at the earliest,
03. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a request to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
30.01.2025
Vijay
S. No. 11