RIYA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8628/2025 · 2025-12-01
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179261 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179261 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8628 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard Shri Suresh Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Shri vikas Yadav, leanred counsel for opposite party and Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application is filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet no. 52 of 2021, dated 12.5.2021 and order of cognizance and summoning order dated 01.10.2021 as well as the criminal proceeding in Criminal Case No.5959 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No.0093 of 2021 under Sections 323, 504, 506 427 I.P.C. Police Station Munshiganj, District Amethi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for the complainant inform that applicant of the present case as well as complainant of the present case are neighbors and due to misunderstanding, quarrel had taken place and thereafter following cross cases were lodged : i.e. FIR No.92 of 2021 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC., P.S. Munshiganj, District Amethi, and FIR No.93 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Munshiganj, District Amethi on the written complaint of Riya Singh and Ram Kumar Yadav respectively. As issue has already been resolved between the parties and they do not want to prosecute each other and the settlement agreement is also placed before this Court along with the supplementary affidavit filed today. 4. All the parties in both the FIRs are present and they jointly requested that the parties are residing peacefully and they do not want to prosecute each other therefore, proceeding may be quashed. 5. Learned AGA does not dispute the settlement agreement between the parties. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Riya Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and going through the contents of the settlement agreement entered between the parties in both the crime, as the parties are living peacefully - Riya Singh, D/o Shivpoojan Singh, Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar, Son of Ram Kumar Yadav, Son of Raghunath Yadav, Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar and Shivpoojan Singh, Son of Late Ram Chander and Ajit Singh, Son of Kullu, Son of Bhagauti Singh had categorically stated before this Court that due to misunderstanding, both the FIRs were lodged and they are peacefully living, they do not want to prosecute. 7. Accordingly, this Court is of the view that the trial of both the cases would be futile one therefore, proceeding arising from FIR No.92 of 2021 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC., P.S. Munshiganj, District Amethi, and FIR No.93 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Munshiganj, District Amethi pending in the Court of Civil Judge, (Senior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur, (State vs.Shiv Poojan & others) are hereby, set aside and are quashed. 8. The application is allowed. December 1, 2025 Pks A482 No. 8628 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench