FATEH BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HIGHER EDUCATION LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
/13878/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179260 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179260 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13878 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite party Nos.1 to 5.
2. In view of the order being passed, issuance of notice to opposite party No.6 stands dispensed with.
3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits. A prayer has also been made for payment of remaining pensionary benefits alongwith interest.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. Regional Higher Education Officer, 8-Sector, M, Ashiyana, near Smriti Upwan, Lucknow - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 2, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Fateh Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Higher Education Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench