MUNNI DEVI AND ANOTHER v. APAR AYUKT, LUCKNOW MANDAL, LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
A227/6725/2025 · 2025-11-18
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179259 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179259 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6725 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no. 1 and Shri Dileep Kumar Pandey,
learned counsel for respondent no.8.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1 to decide the Revision No. 473/2006-07 (Pachho Vs. Gangadevi and others) under Section 333 of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, pending before the opposite party no.1, within the time frame period by this Hon'ble Court.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - is directed to make all endeavor to decide the Revision No. 473/2006-07 (Pachho Vs. Gangadevi and others) under Section 333 of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lokendra Kumar Gupta, Mirza Humayun Qadar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Munni Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) Apar Ayukt, Lucknow Mandal, Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s)
order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 18, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6725 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench