HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4998 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Sri Ajay Shukla, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that certain defects have crept in the petition as such he does not want to press the petition and prays for liberty to file a fresh petition. Sri Ashish Saxena, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. December 15, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Hriday Narayan Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) Additional Labour Commissioner/Sub Registrar,Trade Union Lucknow .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench