HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7139 of 2019 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. 2. None is present on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Vide order dated 30th September, 2019, learned counsel for opposite parties were directed to appear along with their counsel before the Senior Registrar for verification of the compromise agreement. 4. The Senior Registrar submitted his report on 30.9.2019 stating that neither the parties nor their counsel were present for the verification of compromise- agreement. 5. Today none is present on behalf of the petitioners. 6. It transpires that the case has lost its efficacy by efflux of time, hence it is dismissed. November 28, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Santosh Verma And Ors. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench