GHAZALA BANO v. STATE OF U.P.THRU SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/5866/2016 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179222 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179222 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5866 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Ravi Prakash Yadav, counsel for respondent no. 4 and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, counsel for respondent no. 2 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 20, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd Wajid Irfan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Gyanendra Kumar Srivastav, P.S. Bajpai (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ghazala Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench