HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 736 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 10, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nand Lal Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vijai Krishna (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Dr. Sudhanshu Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Cultural Deptt. Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench