HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1643 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.381 of 2025, under Sections 333, 74, 115(2), 351(3), 64 of BNS, Police Station Bangarmau, District Unnao. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged by the informant that on 27.06.2025, when she was sleeping at home, the applicant came home and started misbehaving with her and hold her hand. No allegation of rape was levelled. In the statement under Section 180 of BNS also, no allegation of rape was levelled, however, after about three months, the victim changed her statement and stated that on the same day, rape was also committed. The medical on the victim conducted on three occasions naturally did not corroborate the allegation. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. Sri Raghvendra Pratap Singh, learned Counsel for the complainant also strongly opposed the bail prayer, however, he could not justify the huge variance in the statement under Sections 180 and 183 of BNSS. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Devesh Bahadur Singh, Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Raghvendra Pratap Singh Neeraj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and the fact that the informant is about 20 years of age and prima facie, the allegations are highly improbable, thus, a case for anticipatory is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Neeraj be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bond and sureties of Rs.5,000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 13, 2025 akverma NABAIL No. 1643 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench