Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179206 (ALL)

VINAY KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/10344/2025 · 2025-12-12

Gautam Chowdhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10344 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. At the very outset, Sri Rao Narendra Singh, learned A.G.A. has contended that the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is the second application. He further submits that the instant second application is not maintainable in view of judgement rendered by Hon'ble Apex in the matter of Bhisham Lal Verma Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in 2024 (15) SCC 282. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant could not dispute the submission advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 3. Accordingly, it is dismissed. December 12, 2025 S.Ali Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Durgesh Mishra, Manvendra Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Vinay Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench