HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10301 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following main relief: "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the order dated 30.07.2025 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate Pargana-Auras, Tehsil Hasanganj, District Unnao as contained in Annexure No.01 to this writ petition. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the income certificate issued to the petitioner on 25.09.2024 contained as Annexure No.2 to this writ petition. iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties to correct the income certificate of the petitioner. iv. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties to issue a lease deed of pond bearing Gata No.910-Ta measuring area 0.5210 hectare situated in village Karimabad, Hamlet of Village Shimau, Pargana Auras, Tehsil Hasanganj, District Unnao. v. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider the case of petitioner for grant of lease and approved it in accordingly." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Upadhyay, Anjali Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Santosh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that income of the petitioner is less than 48,000/- per year, which is the qualification in the notification. 4. Respondent No.3 carried out an investigation and found that his income is far higher than that and accordingly rejected the application of the petitioner. 5. Per contra, Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the size of the pond is almost 1/2 hectare and the petitioner is fishing last more than 10 years and his income is far much more than 48,000/- and he is not eligible for the bid. 6. In light of the same, we see no merits in the writ petition and is, accordingly, dismissed. November 3, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 10301 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench