RAM ANUJ VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/3408/2025 · 2025-11-25
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3408 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Ms. Neelam Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. Sri Firoz Ahmad Khan, learned Counsel for the complainant.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.405 of 2024, under Sections 64(1), 115(2), 351(3) of BNS, Police Station Raunahi, District Ayodhya/ Faizabad.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the sister of the informant had gone out of her home on 12.08.2024 when the applicant had committed wrong on her. The tentative age of the victim is 33 years. The victim in her statement stated that wrong was committed on her. The medical report on record indicates the hymen to be fresh torn and bleeding present.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the age of the victim and in absence of any injury on the body of the victim and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 12.08.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ram Anuj Verma be released on bail in the abovesaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, Neelam Pandey, Vivek Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Firoz Ahmad Khan Ram Anuj Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 25, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 3408 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench