MOHRRAM ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO
BAIL/10007/2025 · 2025-10-30
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179177 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179177 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10007 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.258 of 2025, under Section 80(2), 85, 103(1) BNS & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Rupaideeha, District Bahraich.
3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to the son of the applicant and subsequently, the entire matrimonial family had killed her. The applicant herein is father-in-law. Cause of death, as per the postmortem report, is ante mortem throttling.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant who is father-in-law of the deceased has a separate living.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the postmortem report and there being nothing on record to demonstrate that soon before her death the victim was harassed mentally or physically at the instance of the applicant in relation to demand of dowry, the applicant who is aged about 70 years and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Mohrram Ali be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohrram Ali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
amount each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 30, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 10007 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench