HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9838 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None for the petitioners. 3. There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case. 4. This Court passed the following order on 7.1.2025: "1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and perused the material placed on record. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of First Information Report dated 27.11.2024 bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0372 of 2024, under Sections 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Pratapgarh. 3. The submission of learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The gang chart was proposed by Additional Superintendent of Police (West), Nodal Officer Gangster, District-Pratapgarh on 11.11.2024 noting the fact the petitioner is on bail, however, the bail was granted to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 12.11.2024, therefore, the gang chart is prepared by the concerned officers without application of mind. 4. Therefore, a case for consideration is made out. 5. Let Additional Superintendent of Police (West), Nodal Officer Gangster, Pratapgarh files his personal affidavit within three weeks from today. 6. List after three weeks. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Purshottam Chaurasia, Prashant Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Utkarsh Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. Considering the submissions made, it is provided that till the next date of listing, the petitioner shall not be arrested on the basis of the impugned First Information Report, unless sufficient and credible evidence is available against him. The petitioner shall, however, cooperate in the investigation and get his statement recorded before the Investigating Officer as and when he is called. If he does not do so then it can be made a ground for seeking vacation of this interim order. " 5. Learned AGA on the basis of telephonic instructions, submits that Charge Sheet No. 65/23025 dated 7.5.2025 has been forwarded in the matter, therefore, this petition has lost its efficacy. 7. Dismissed accordingly. November 7, 2025 Fahim/- CRLP No. 9838 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench