Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17917 (GAU)

SRI TARLOK SINGH AND ORS v. ON THE DEATH OF JATINDRA NATH BHARALI

I.A.(Civil)/3191/2024 · 2025-04-20

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010185332024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3191/2024 SRI TARLOK SINGH AND ORS S/O LT. AMLOK SINGH RESIDENT OF GARALI WARD NO.8 P.O. AND DIST. JORHAT ASSAM. 2: SHRI GURMIT SINGH S/O LT. AMLOK SINGH RESIDENT OF GARALI WARD NO.8 P.O. AND DIST. JORHAT ASSAM. 3: SHRI SARBJIT SINGH S/O LT. AMLOK SINGH RESIDENT OF GARALI WARD NO.8 P.O. AND DIST. JORHAT ASSAM. VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF JATINDRA NATH BHARALI HIS LEGAL HEIRS CHARUMA BHARALI AND ORS 1.1:CHARUMA BHARALI W/O LATE JATINDRA NATH BHARALI R/O PRINCE OF WALES RESIDENTIAL CAMPUS P.O. AND DISTRICT JORHAT Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 1.2:RAJ BHARALI S/O LATE JATINDRA NATH BHARALI R/O PRINCE OF WALES RESIDENTIAL CAMPUS P.O. AND DISTRICT JORHAT ASSAM 1.3:RAJA BHARALI S/O LATE JATINDRA NATH BHARALI R/O PRINCE OF WALES RESIDENTIAL CAMPUS P.O. AND DISTRICT JORHAT ASSAM 1.4:RANA BHUSHAN BHARALI S/O LATE JATINDRA NATH BHARALI R/O PRINCE OF WALES RESIDENTIAL CAMPUS P.O. AND DISTRICT JORHAT ASSAM 2:SRI PRAKASH RANJAN SARKAR S/O LT. BIMAN BIHARI SARKAR RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6 GOLAGHAT TOWN DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM 3:SMTI JYOTI SARKAR WO LT. BINOD BIHARI SARKAR RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6 GOLAGHAT TOWN DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM 4:SRI MANJIT SARKAR S/O LT. BINOD BIHARI SARKAR RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6 GOLAGHAT TOWN DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM 5:SRI BIJIT SARKAR S/O LT. BIMAN BIHARI SARKAR Page No.# 3/3 RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6 GOLAGHAT TOWN DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. D MOZUMDER Advocate for : appearing for ON THE DEATH OF JATINDRA NATH BHARALI In RSA Case No. 59/2009 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 21.04.2025 1. Heard Mr. S. Biswas, the learned counsel for the applicants. None has appeared for the respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Mr. A. Borua, the learned counsel appears for the legal heirs of the deceased respondent No.1. 2. By virtue of the order passed today, i.e. on 21.04.2025, in I.A. (Civil) No. 3190/2024, the delay in preferring the present application for setting aside the abatement on death of the respondent No. 1 was condoned. 3. Mr. A. Borua, the learned counsel appears for the legal heirs of the deceased respondent No.1 has not opposed the prayer for setting aside abatement. 4. Further, for the reasons stated in the present application, the abatement of the appeal against the respondent No. 1 on his death is hereby set aside and this Interlocutory Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant