SONU ALIAS GHANSHYAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/4273/2025 · 2025-03-31
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17917 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17917 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 52 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 4273 of 2025 Applicant :- Sonu Alias Ghanshyam And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pt. S.P. Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shailendra Singh,Vikas Tiwari Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the applicants filed today in the Court, is taken on record. 2. Heard Pt. S.P. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Vikas Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present application U/S 528 BNSS has been filed to quash the charge-sheet No.09 of 2024 dated 11.01.2024 as well as entire proceedings of S.T. No.1945 of 2024 (State of U.P. Vs. Sonu @ Ghanshyam and another), arising out of Case Crime No.176 of 2023, under Sections 354, 354A, 506, 504 I.P.C. and 3(2) 5A SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Police Station Todifatehpur, District Jhansi, pending in the Court of learned Special Judge SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Jhansi as well as cognizance order dated 11.12.2024 passed in the aforesaid case. 4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants gave up his challenge to the aforesaid prayer and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicants to surrender before the concerned court below. The aforesaid prayer has been made in the supplementary affidavit filed today. The learned counsel for the applicants further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned court below to consider and decide the bail application/surrender application of the applicants expeditiously. 5. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State submit that in case the applicants are not pressing the relief as sought for by them on merits and want to surrender before the concerned court below, they have no objection in granting protection to them for a short period. 6. In view of above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall file a surrender application before the concerned Court below within three weeks.
On receiving the surrender application, the Court concerned shall obtain instructions from the public prosecutor and fix a date for appearance/surrender of the applicants and for hearing the applicants on surrender application. 7. On the date fixed by the Court concerned, the applicants will have liberty to prefer a bail application and a copy of the same be provided to the public prosecutor. In case, any such bail application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided by the Court below along with the surrender application, on the date fixed, in accordance with law, after hearing the informant/opposite party no.2, keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court. 8. For the period of three weeks from today or till the surrender application is decided, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed off. Order Date :- 1.4.2025 Abhishek Singh Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad