BABU LAL S/O SHRI SHANKAR LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMA/204/2025 · 2025-05-23
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17916 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17916 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21846] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 204/2025 In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 292/2025
1. Babu Lal S/o Shri Shankar Lal, R/o Village Sanmanpura, Police Station Khatoli, District Kota Rajasthan.
2. Yashoda Nandan S/o Ramdayal, R/o Village Sanmanpura, Police Station Khatoli, District Kota, Rajasthan.
3. Satish Kumar S/o Shri Chaturbhuj, R/o Village Sanmanpura, Police Station Khatoli, District Kota, Rajasthan. ----Accused/Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP and Another ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Prakash Dhanera, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 23/05/2025 The instant criminal misc. application under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the applicant No.1 – Babu Lal S/o Shri Shankar Lal seeking additional time for surrendering before the learned trial Court. Vide order dated 23.01.2025, bail application filed under section 482 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner No.1 – Babu Lal S/o Shri Shankar Lal was dismissed as withdrawn. However, petitioner was given liberty to surrender before the trial Court on or before 07.02.2025 and move a regular bail application. The trial
[2025:RJ-JP:21846] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-204/2025] Court was also requested to consider and decide it on the very same day in accordance with law. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed. The petitioner No.1 – Babu Lal S/o Shri Shankar Lal shall surrender before the learned trial Court on or before 31.05.2025 and move a regular bail application which is to be filed before 08:30 AM of working day. The trial Court is requested to consider and decide it on the very same day in accordance with law, if possible. However, it is made clear that no interim protection from arrest is operating in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous application stands
disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/184