SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/9839/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179150 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179150 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9839 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed with the following main reliefs:
"1.) To quash the illegal impugned non bailable warrant order dated 14/11/2025 in Complaint Case No. 1488/2024 having in re: Prem Nath Singh Vs. Sushil Kumar Singh another, pending before the Court of Additional Civil Judge Junior division , Pratapgarh i.e. Annexure No.1, in the interest of justice. 2.) To quash the illegal impugned bailable warrant order dated 15/05/25 in Complaint Case No. 1488/2024 having in re: Prem Nath Singh Vs. Sushil Kumar Singh another, pending before the Court of Additional Civil Judge Junior division , Pratapgarh i.e. Annexure No.2, in the interest of justice."
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merits. However, he submits that the applicant will surrender before the trial court and apply for bail. He prays that the applicant may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386).
4. It is, therefore, directed that in case the applicant surrenders before the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prabhat Kumar Ojha, Ajay Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sushil Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Court below within three weeks from today and prefers bail application, the trial court will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
5. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
6. The application stands disposed of. November 20, 2025 Sachin A482 No. 9839 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench