Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 527 of 2003 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Case called out in the revised call.
2. None is present for the appellant(s) when the case is taken up for hearing and there is no request for adjournment/pass-over made on behalf of the appellant(s). Shri Nilesh Singh, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
3. It appears that since this matter pertains to the year 2003, appellant(s) has lost his interest in pursuing this case and therefore, by efflux of time, the appeal appears to have become infructuous.
4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. November 7, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rakesh Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Manish Mathur, Anil Srivastava, Nilesh Singh, Rajneesh Kumar Verma, Vijay Laxmi Singh (Prashant Kumar,J.) Rati Bhan Singh .....Appellant(s) Smt. Maya Devi And 4 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench