SANTOSH KUMAR v. SRI SHANSHANK TRIPATHI DISTT. MAGISTRATE BARABANKI AND ANOTHER
CAPL/3096/2025 · 2025-12-05
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179111 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179111 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3096 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Case has been called in the revised list.
2. Neither learned counsel for the applicant is present to press the contempt application nor there is any request for adjournment or pass over of the case.
3. The contempt application is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. The notice, if any, issued against the respondent stands discharged. December 5, 2025 S. Kumar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Santosh Kumar .....Applicant(s) Sri Shanshank Tripathi Distt. Magistrate Barabanki And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench