Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1791 (UTT)

APURAVA BANSAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/66/2025 · 2025-04-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.66 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State is present. 3. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner on 04.12.2023. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner though does not dispute the said fact, but it is submitted by him that as yet the charge-sheet has not been submitted before the court of competent jurisdiction. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is provided that the interim order is continue till the submission of the charge-sheet before the court of competent jurisdiction. 6. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge- sheet in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate Forum (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.04.2025 AK