Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179087 (ALL)

SATYAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/339/2025 · 2025-11-26

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 339 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition, even in the revised call, however, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 and learned AGA for the State are present. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. November 26, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Satyam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench