Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179070 (ALL)

PRATIMA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/14213/2025 · 2025-12-10

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14213 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Mr. Shivam Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no. 6 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "i) To issue a order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties, particularly opposite party number 3 to consider the case of the petitioner for her Intra District Transfer / Adjustment from Uchcha Prathmik Vidyalaya Pahuri, Block Sareni, District Raebareli to Composite Vidyalaya, Churua, Block Bachhrawan, District Raebareli or in any other School in Block Bachhrawan, District Raebareli in pursuance of the Government Order / Policy dated 14.11.2025, contained as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition; ii) To issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just, fit and necessary in the circumstances of the case may also be passed; and iii) To allow this writ petition with cost." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 6 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey, Ram Narain Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shivam Sharma Pratima Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 6/ District Basic Education Officer, Raebareli, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. December 10, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 14213 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench