[2025:RJ-JP:23059] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5920/2025 Arif S/o Samshudeen, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Nangla Firozpur (Ganwda), Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5964/2025 Rahul S/o Ramu, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Agon, Police Station Firojpur Jhirka, District Nuh Mewat, Haryana. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5965/2025 1. Gaffar S/o Maksud, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dhaulet, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Jaid S/o Sahun, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Alampur, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.) [2025:RJ-JP:23059] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5920/2025] Order 11/06/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in respect of FIR No. 84/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(2), 340(2), 308(2) & 61(2)(b) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that only on account of possessing mobile, they have been arrested by the Police authorities, whereas they have not committed any offence whatsoever. Learned counsel further submits that even otherwise the allegations levelled in the FIR are triable by the Magistrate and there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. Counsel also submits that the accused- petitioners are behind the bars since long time. Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Therefore, the accused-petitioners may be allowed to enlarge on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. Taking into consideration, the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long time and they would no longer be required for custodial interrogation, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these Bail Applications are hereby allowed. The [2025:RJ-JP:23059] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5920/2025] accused-petitioners Arif S/o Samshudeen, Rahul S/o Ramu, Gaffar S/o Maksud & Jaid S/o Sahun shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No. 84/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. 7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. 8. Office is directed to place a copy of this order in each connected file. (ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J DIVYA /181-183