Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17906 (HP)

PROMILA DEVI v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/7985/2024 · 2025-09-18

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Promila Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. CWP No. 7985 of 2024 18.9.2025 Present: Mr. Virbahadur Verma and Mukul Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. While placing on record communication dated 16.9.2025 enclosing therewith copy of office order date 10.9.2025, issued under the signature of Director of School Education, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated stands duly complied with. Having perused aforesaid document, which is taken on record, there appears to be merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated, petitioner, who was appointed on contract basis, has been considered as regular employee in the pay scale of Rs. 10300-34800+4200 Grade Pay + allowances as admissible from time to time from the date when she was initially appointed/joined on contract basis with all consequential benefits. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, same are closed with direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits in terms of aforesaid compliance, if not already released, be released, expeditiously, preferably, within six weeks. September 18, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), manjit Judge