KATESHVAR NATH v. TEHSILDAR MANKAPUR, TEHSIL MANKAPUR, GONDA AND OTHERS
/7058/2025 · 2025-12-08
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7058 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Vijay Pal Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Mankapur, District - Gonda, to decide Recall/Restoration Application dated 17.04.2025, filed in Case No. 5990 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202408300705990) - Kateshwar Nath Vs. Dinesh Kumar, U/S 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Mankapur, District - Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Mankapur, District - Gonda, is directed to decide Recall/Restoration Application dated 17.04.2025, filed in Case No. 5990 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202408300705990) - Kateshwar Nath Vs. Dinesh Kumar, U/S 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 8, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Pal Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Kateshvar Nath .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar Mankapur, Tehsil Mankapur, Gonda And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench