NANKE BHASHKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
/11330/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179048 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179048 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11330 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a mandamus commanding the opposite parties No. 1 and 2 to transfer the investigation of Case Crime No. 0181 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333 B.N.S. and 3(2)(va), 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, registered at Police Station Nawabganj, District Bahraich.
3. At the very outset, learned AGA states on the basis of instructions sent by one Sri Indrajeet Yadav, Sub Inspector, Police Station Nawabganj, District Bahraich dated 29.11.2025, that a chargesheet dated 21.11.2025 has been submitted before the supervisory authority.
4. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press this petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. . (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) December 2, 2025 Reena/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Sharma, Ankit Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Nanke Bhashkar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench