Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179034 (ALL)

VIJAY RAMAY RUCHIRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. BASIC EDUCATION DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12745/2025 · 2025-11-03

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12745 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, advocate, holding brief of Mr. Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 & 4, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 2, Mr. Rajeev Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties, particularly Opposite Party No. 3, to sanction and release the pension in favour of the petitioner being the sole legal heir of Late Smt. Manju Rawat, in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ, orders as direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to release all service-related dues of Late Smt. Manju Rawat, including GPF, Gratuity, Group Insurance, Leave Encashment, and any other admissible benefits, along with interest at 12% per annum from the date of her demise i.e. 04.01.2016 till actual payment, in the interest of justice." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10.04.2025 within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar, Akansha Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh, Rishabh Tripathi Vijay Ramay Ruchira Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Basic Education Deptt. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the respondent no.3/District Basic Education Officer, Sitapur is hereby directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10.04.2025, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 3, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 12745 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench