MRS. SHASHI SINGH AND ANOTHER v. SHRI GAURAV KUMAR, MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION, LKO.
CAPL/1364/2025 · 2025-11-04
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179027 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179027 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1364 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Supplementary affidavit filed by the applicant is taken on record. Respondent has filed compliance affidavit which is also taken on record. Learned counsel for the applicant is disputing the compliance and has submitted that till date, the road has not been constructed, so the judgment and order passed by the writ Court dated 16.12.2024 has not been complied with. The order dated 16.12.2024 is quoted hereinbelow:-
"1.Sri Yatendra Pathak, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf on opposite party no.2 which is taken on record.
2. Heard.
3. Let the grievance of the petitioners be considered by opposite party no.2 after getting the facts verified. Petitioners may submit a representation in this regard to the said officer mentioning relevant facts and supporting proof, if any. The grievance be considered and decided within two months.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. " From perusal of the order, it is found that there was a direction to consider the grievance of the applicant by deciding the same. The grievance of the applicant is decided by order dated 24.06.2025 which has been enclosed along with photographs as Annexure No. 3 to the compliance affidavit. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailendra Singh Rajawat, Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Yatindra Pathak Mrs. Shashi Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) Shri Gaurav Kumar, Municipal Commissioner, Corporation, Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
After perusal of the same, it is found that the order passed in the writ petition has been complied with. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed. If the applicant is still aggrieved, he may avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law.
November 4, 2025 Nitesh CAPL No. 1364 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench