HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6435 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar to decide Recall Application No. 233 of 2018 filed for recall of order dated 15.09.2018, passed in Revision No. 529/2017530404000060 - Surynarayan and Others Vs. Ramshankar and Others, U/S 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide Recall Application No. 233 of 2018 filed for recall of order dated 15.09.2018, passed in Revision No. 529/2017530404000060 - Surynarayan and Others Vs. Ramshankar and Others, U/S 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava, Umakant Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Ramashankar @ Rama Shankar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Learned Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench