ARUN KUMAR JAIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. INFRASTRUCTURE and INDS. and ORS
WRIA/15035/2016 · 2025-11-25
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179023 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179023 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15035 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 25, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, Gaurav Mehrotra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Arun Kumar Jain .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Infrastructure And Inds. And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench