Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17902 (JHR)

MUNNA DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5590/2025 · 2025-07-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:18486] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5590 of 2025 ------ Munna Das, aged about 20 years, son of Lalo Das, resident of Village Masanjora, Post Office Mathurapur & Police Station Jasidih & District Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 09-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.61 of 2025 registered under Section 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 61 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B, 66 C, 66 D and 84 C of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and two mobile phones and one SIM Card has been recovered from his possession and he has defrauded the victim Saddam to the tune of Rs.3,500/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-11 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and that he will transfer the amount allegedly defrauded to the bank account of the aforesaid victim without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.04.2025 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transferring Rs.3,500/- in the account of victim Saddam without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.61 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/