GOVIND KUMAR v. NAIB TEHSILDAR SHAHGANJ, TEHSIL BIKAPUR, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
A227/6613/2025 · 2025-11-13
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179010 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179010 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6613 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Maya Ram Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Naib Tehsildar, Shahganj, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya, to decide Recall Application dated 11.01.2024 filed in Case No. 3243 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304230303243) - Govind Vs. Ramchandra, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Naib Tehsildar, Shahganj, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Naib Tehsildar, Shahganj, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya, is directed to decide Recall Application dated 11.01.2024 filed in Case No. 3243 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304230303243) - Govind Vs. Ramchandra, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
November 13, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Maya Ram Yadav, Akhand Pratap Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Govind Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar Shahganj, Tehsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench