Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17900 (CHH)

BHUSHAN SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1329/2025 · 2025-04-21

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17911 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1329 of 2025 1 - Bhushan Sahu S/o Kirtichandra Sahu Aged About 29 Years R/o Village- Jampali, Police Station- Jharkhand, District- Bargah (Odisha) 2 - Smt. Jasmini Sahu W/o Chandrakumar Sahu Aged About 29 Years R/o. Village- Jampali, Police Station Jharband, District- Bargarh (Odisha) ... Petitioners versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Of Police Station Basna, District – Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 21.04.2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through vide conferencing. 2. This is an ofÏce reference. 3. This Court, vide order dated 03.10.2024, passed in MCRC No. 6270 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the petitioners, namely, Bhushan Sahu and Smt. Jasmini Sahum, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 06 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 4. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Saraipali, District – Mahasamund (C.G.) through the Principal District and Sessions Judge, District – Mahasamund (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 02.04.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that the trial is at the stage of prosecution evidence, and the prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined due to their absence, therefore, and the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of three months from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar