Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17899 (RAJ)

RADHIKA SRIVASTAVA D/O SHRI SHIVRAJ NARAYAN SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/6839/2025 · 2025-05-05

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18878] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6839/2025 Radhika Srivastava D/o Shri Shivraj Narayan Srivastava, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Mahaveer Nagar, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saxena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Namita Parihar, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 05/05/2025 1. The grievance of petitioner is that after promoting her to the post of School Lecturer (Chemistry), she has been given posting at Government Senior Secondary School, Dahikhera, District Jhalawar vide order dated 12.04.2025, whereas some posts of School Lecturer are lying vacant at her previous place of posting i.e. Kota. 2. Indisputably, pursuant to order dated 12.04.2025, petitioner has joined at Government Senior Secondary School, Dahikhera, District Jhalawar. In such view of the matter, limited prayer of counsel for petitioner is that petitioner has filed a representation, which may be directed to be considered by respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:18878] (2 of 2) [CW-6839/2025] 3. Taking into consideration the limited prayer of counsel for petitioner, without interference with the merits of impugned order of posting, instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to pursue her representation before the respondents, if same is pending. 4. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/36