Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17899 (KAR)

MANJUNATH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/5184/2023 · 2025-03-04

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9260 WP No. 5184 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 5184 OF 2023 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: MANJUNATH S/O LATE SINGARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT BANDIKERI BEEDI SRIRANGAPATTANA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 438. …PETITIONER (BY SRI KUMARA K. G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHSHILDAR SRIRANGAPATNA MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 438. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA - 571 401. 4. THE CHIEF OFFICER TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SRIRANGAPATNA Digitally signed by KAVYA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9260 WP No. 5184 of 2023 MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 438. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI H.C.SHIVARAMU, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07.02.2022 AS PER THE ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer: “a) Issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions, directing the third Respondent to consider the representation dated 07.02.2022 as per the (ANNEXURE-E). b) To grant such other relief's as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, including award of the cost of these proceedings, in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Sri H.C.Shivaramu, learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that the petition is rendered infructuous due to efflux of time. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9260 WP No. 5184 of 2023 3. The submission merit acceptance on the score that the petitioner has submitted representation seeking extension of time. The representation dated 07.02.2023 reads as follows: “ಆದಂದ ಈ ಮೂರು ಮೂರು ಮೂರು ಮೂರು (03) ಂಗಳ ಂಗಳ ಂಗಳ ಂಗಳ ೕಲಂಡ ಮಂಜುಾ ಮಂಜುಾ ಮಂಜುಾ ಮಂಜುಾ ೇ ೇ ೇ ೇ ಂಾೌಡ ಂಾೌಡ ಂಾೌಡ ಂಾೌಡ ಆದ ಾನು "ಾಹನ ವಸೂಾ ಶುಲವನು' ಪ)ರಸ*ಾ "ಾ+,-ಯ ಸಂಗಮ ಪ/0ೇಶದ12 ೕಲಂಡ ಆ0ೇಶದನ3ಯ 4ಾ5ರುವ)6ಲ2. ಆದಂದ ಾನು ಆ78ಕ"ಾ: ಬಹಳ ನಷ=ವನು' ಅನುಭ@ರುAೆ-ೕೆ. ೕಲಂಡ Bಾರಣಗಳನು' ೋ5, Aಾವ)ಗಳ "ಾ "ಾ "ಾ "ಾಹನ ಹನ ಹನ ಹನ ಶುಲ ಶುಲ ಶುಲ ಶುಲ ವಸೂಾ ವಸೂಾ ವಸೂಾ ವಸೂಾ 4ಾಡುವ)ದನು' 4ಾಡುವ)ದನು' 4ಾಡುವ)ದನು' 4ಾಡುವ)ದನು' ಮೂರು ಮೂರು ಮೂರು ಮೂರು (03) ಂಗಳ ಂಗಳ ಂಗಳ ಂಗಳ ಅವDಯವEೆೆ ಅವDಯವEೆೆ ಅವDಯವEೆೆ ಅವDಯವEೆೆ ಮುಂದುವEೆಸBೊಡFೇBಾ: ಮುಂದುವEೆಸBೊಡFೇBಾ: ಮುಂದುವEೆಸBೊಡFೇBಾ: ಮುಂದುವEೆಸBೊಡFೇBಾ: ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ತಮH12 @ನಂBೊಳIAೆ-ೕೆ.” It was for the purpose of extension of tender for collection of parking fee for a period of three months. The representation is submitted on 07.02.2023, three months is long over. Therefore, the petition would not survive for further consideration. 4. Above all, this Court on 11.04.2023, had passed the following order: “The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to consider his representation dated 07.02.2022. Sri. H.C. Shivaramu, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 submits that his representation has been considered and rejected by an endorsement dated 23.02.2023. The petitioner seeks liberty to call in question the said endorsement. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:9260 WP No. 5184 of 2023 Reserving such liberty, list this matter immediately after summer vacation - 2023.” Even as on today, there is no challenge raised to the endorsement so issued rejecting the representation. 5. In the light of the aforesaid circumstance, the petition lacking in merit, stands disposed. SD/- ____________________ JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 75 CT:SS