HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14621 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Mr. Anupam Shukla and Mr. Manish Vaish, learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 21.09.2025 with regard to transfer of petitioners as well as relieving order dated 22.09.2025. 3. It has been submitted that from a perusal of impugned order, it is evident that petitioners were transferred on account of some report which was submitted against them. It is submitted that although petitioners were not provided a copy of the report but the nature of order impugned indicates it having been passed as a mode of punishment, which is against the dictum laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Somesh Tiwari v. Union of India and others reported in (2009) 2 SCC 592. 4. Learned State Counsel has earlier also been provided written instructions dated 06.12.2025 and has also been provided fresh instructions dated 15.12.2025, a copy of which are taken on record and reiterates the aspects that petitioners' transfer has been effected on account of confidential reports submitted against them, which clearly indicate their connivance with criminals of the area as also negligence towards discharge of duties. 5. Despite time having been granted, the reports which form the basis Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Shukla, Manish Vaish Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sushil Kumar Shukla (Pno. 062500643)And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) of allegations levelled against petitioners have not been produced due to which exact allegations levelled against petitioners in the report submitted today appear to be vague. 6. It is also evident from instructions as well as report that petitioners have been transferred as a mode of punishment, which is clearly against the law enunciated by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Somesh Tiwari (supra). 7. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances and law indicated, impugned orders dated 21.09.2025 and 22.09.2025 are hereby quashed by issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari granting liberty to opposite parties to pass orders afresh, if required, but only in administrative exigencies or public interest, and not as a mode of punishment. 8. Resultantly, the petition succeeds and is allowed at the admission stage itself. Parties to bear their own costs. December 17, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 14621 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench