Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20362 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1800 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Sumer Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash,Onkar Nath Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rohit Pandey Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Onkar Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rohit Pandey on behalf of respondent University. 2. Petitioner is repeatedly filing writ petitions without verifying facts that objection to the answer key was considered and reasons were already been published on the website as well as on petitioner's login, however, such details are not mentioned in the writ petition that objection to one answer was accepted. 3. Objections, if any, to the revised answer key are not sustainable since material on record is not sufficient to accept any objection. 4. The Court also takes note of position of law in regard to minimum interference with expert's opinion as reiterated in Vivek Kumar Gupta and Anr Vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) 2 SCC 309 and on facts there is no ground for interference. 5. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 SB Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad