RATNESH KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.DEPTT.OF NAGAR LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/8079/2016 · 2025-11-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178970 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178970 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 8079 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 19, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhand Pratap Singh Bise, Dinesh Kumar Mishra, Prachand Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., K.D. Shahi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ratnesh Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Nagar Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench