MONU YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF AYUSH LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/10884/2025 · 2025-11-13
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10884 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Kaustubh Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sandip Srivastava, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Suresh Chandra Verma, Advocate who has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party no.2-Ayurvedic Tatha Unani Tibbi Chikitsa Paddati Board, U.P. Lucknow and filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record.
2. This is an application for amendment in the writ petition so as to challenge the validity of an order dated 10.10.2025, passed by the opposite party no.2 rejecting the petitioner's claim.
3. The amendment sought is formal in nature and the learned counsel for the opposite parties do not oppose the amendment application.
4. Accordingly, the amendment application is allowed and the
learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to carry out the necessary amendments forthwith.
Order on memo of petition:
5. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the validity of an
order dated 10.10.2025, passed by the opposite party no.2 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kaustubh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Monu Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Ayush Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
rejecting the petitioner's request for registration in internship.
6. The learned counsel for the opposite parties have submitted that the petitioner has got a remedy of filing an appeal against the rejection order available under Section 27 (2) of U.P. Indian Medicine Act, 1939.
7. As the petitioner has got a statutory remedy of appeal available to him, this court does not find any ground to entertain the petition bypassing the statutory remedy.
8. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable leaving it open for the petitioner to file an appeal under the aforesaid provision. In case the petitioner files an appeal the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance law. November 13, 2025 Ram.
WRIC No. 10884 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench