NIRMAL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/9442/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9442 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Case called out in the revised list. None is present for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present. The writ petition is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Consigned to the records. November 20, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prince Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Nirmal Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench