M/S LAXMI TIMBER MERCHANT THRU. ITS PROPERIETOR DINESH KUMAR MISHRA v. SRI ANUPAM GUPTA,THE MEMBER SECY. STATE LEVEL COMMITTIE, WOOD BASEC INDUSTARY LKO.
CAPL/874/2024 · 2025-11-06
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178949 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178949 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 874 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that an order dated 08.08.2024 has been passed on the representation of the applicant in compliance of the order dated 08.11.2023 passed in the writ petition. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the representation has been decided on the wrong facts and hence the respondent is liable to be punished under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record of the case, it is found that on 08.11.2023, an order has been passed in the writ petition. The relevant extract of the same is quoted hereinbelow:-
"In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law after hearing the parties concerned by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of." After perusal of the compliance affidavit and the decision taken on the representation of the applicant by the respondent by its order dated 08.08.2024, it is found that the judgment and order passed in the writ petition has been complied with. In view of the facts, circumstances and discussion made hereinabove, the judgment and order passed in the writ petition has been complied with, hence the present contempt application is dismissed. Notice if any stands discharged. November 6, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey, Mahendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) M/S Laxmi Timber Merchant Thru. Its Properietor Dinesh Kumar Mishra .....Applicant(s) Sri Anupam Gupta,The Member Secy. State Level Committie, Wood Basec Industary Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench