VINAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/11150/2025 · 2025-11-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178948 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178948 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11150 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.224 of 2025 under Sections 108 BNS, P.S.- Dalmau, District- Raebareli. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the wife of the informant was in relation with the applicant, because of which, he committed suicide and in the suicide note, he stated that he was committing suicide because the applicant used to threaten him on the mobile. The cause of death as per the post-mortem report is ante-mortem hanging. The applicant is being prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 108 BNSS. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused, namely, Ritika Pandey has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 03.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9478 of
2025. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances and the post-mortem report, ground of parity coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 28.08.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pravin Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinay Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
the application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant- Vinay Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 17, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11150 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench